• Gamma
      link
      fedilink
      English
      20
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      Fallout 3 isn’t even comparable to the originals, it’s a completely different game.

    • Go-On-A-Steam-Train
      link
      fedilink
      144 months ago

      I went and played Fallout 1 because I loved 3 so much… It took a few false starts (1 intelligence was a terrible call for a first playthrough lol, it ended bad)

      Now I see it, 1 and 2 were so brilliant with the role playing and story that I can’t go back to 3! 😊 So many choices, strong characters, just brilliant.

      • @Zink@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        74 months ago

        I have always thought of Fallout 1 as such a pure RPG experience that gives you freedom and options. The main story line only has two objectives you must complete to beat the game, but getting there requires going out into the world and figuring out wtf to do and where to do it.

        • Go-On-A-Steam-Train
          link
          fedilink
          44 months ago

          Can’t you even skip one of those goals? What a great game 😁 It really does let you work it out, but not in an annoying puzzley way

      • davehtaylor
        link
        fedilink
        74 months ago

        I recently did another playthrough, starting with 1. When I got to three, I spent a couple hours with it and just gave up. It’s just so shallow, bland, and lacking compared to 1 and 2.

        New Vegas is the sequel 1 and 2 deserved, and Bethesda tries really hard to pretend it doesn’t exist.

    • chaogomu
      link
      fedilink
      24 months ago

      Only as far as storyline and setting go. Other than that, it was an okay shooter.

        • @Kichae@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          24 months ago

          But at the same time, most of the people who played Fallout 3 never played 1 or 2. By the standards of the time, and for what the game presented itself as, it was pretty cool.